Illustrative composite
College position player
Hit in games the way she hits in the cage.
A composite built from patterns ATP sees, not one person. It shows how the evaluation thinks. Names and numbers appear only once ATP has verified a case and holds permission.
Where it started.
Coaches saw it. She saw it. More cage time had made it worse. Confidence rose and fell with the last at-bat.
What they wanted
To feel like the same hitter in the fourth inning that she is at 3pm in practice.
What ATP saw.
ATP evaluated 3 of the seven domains for this case. The lit circles are where the history sent us. Tap any circle to see what ATP looks at there.
Working diagnosis
Attention narrowed into analysis under pressure, and there was no routine to redirect it. Sleep during the season was short, which was reducing her margin for regulation. A visual-tracking screen was clean.
Mental · Recovery · NeuroTap a circle to see what ATP looks at there.
In order.
What came first, and what came after.
Priority 1: A pre-pitch routine that pointed attention at one external target
Priority 2: A mistake-response protocol she could rehearse in the cage
Priority 3: In-season sleep as a performance variable
What we did.
The tools follow the diagnosis. Every item here was chosen after the priorities were set.
Interventions
- Mental performance coaching
- Routine and attentional training embedded in practice
- Sleep and recovery plan with the strength staff
Testing
- Practice-vs-game tracking
- Self-report and coach-report pressure measures
Format
- Biweekly sessions, hybrid on-site and remote
How the plan changed.
The first routine was too long to survive a real at-bat. It was cut to two cues after the first reassessment. That version held.
- Evaluate
- Working Diagnosis
- Prioritize
- Intervene
- Reassess
- Adapt
Now
Find what’s limiting you.
Every case here started the same way: an evaluation, a working diagnosis, a decision about what comes first.